Narrative Review
Dental-dedicated magnetic resonance imaging for
pulpal and periapical diagnosis compared with cone beam computed tomography
Farnaz Namazi 1
Reese K. Williams 2
Vyas Yesha 2
Domenico Ricucci 3
Franklin Tay 4
https://doi.org/10.71347/fde5u7ow
1 Department of Oral Health and Diagnostic Sciences, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Georgia, USA
2 Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, USA
3 Private practice, Cetraro, Italy
4 Department of Endodontics, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
Corresponding author:
Franklin Tay, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Email: ftay@augusta.edu
Key words: apical periodontitis; cone beam computed tomography; dental-dedicated magnetic resonance
imaging; endodontics; periapical diagnosis
Acknowledgements: The authors deny any conflicts of interest. They thank Marie Churchville for secretarial support.
Abstract
Introduction: Periapical diagnosis in endodontics depends largely on radiographic evidence of mineralized tissue changes. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) improves three-dimensional assessment of periapical bone loss, root anatomy, and surgical planning. However, it does not directly depict pulpal status or soft tissue inflammatory changes. This narrative review examined dental-dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (ddMRI) for periapical diagnosis compared with CBCT, with emphasis on the transition from historical dental MRI to a dedicated dental platform.
Methods: The review distinguished pre-2024 dental MRI studies performed on conventional medical MRI systems from ddMRI studies based on the low-field, coil-specific, task-oriented platform introduced by Greiser et al. in 2024. Evidence was synthesized around lesion detection, inflammatory change, lesion characterization, artifacts, radiation exposure, workflow, and clinical positioning.
Results: Dental MRI showed that MRI could detect periapical lesions, depict fluid-rich and marrow-related changes, and characterize cystic versus granulomatous lesions. Dental-dedicated MRI extends this work through localized acquisition, dedicated hardware, and task-specific sequences. Early ddMRI evidence suggests potential for evaluating pulp vitality, regeneration and periapical edema-like change within one non-ionizing examination. However, current data are limited by small feasibility studies and incomplete validation.
Al-Haj Husain A, Lie SAN, Sandhu S, Wagner MEH, Stadlinger B, Burian E, Frauenfelder T, Hainc N, Kessler P, Essig H (2025). Magnetic resonance imaging in dental, oral and maxillofacial trauma: a systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 53, 1438-1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.05.016
Al-Haj Husain A, Sandhu S, Wagner MEH, Burian E, Lie SAN, Precht MM, Zedler D, Frauenfelder T, Hötker AM, Stadlinger B, Sommer S, Kessler P, Essig H (2026). Diagnostic performance of CT and MRI in mandibular trauma assessment: a prospective comparative study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 30, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01496-3
Al-Haj Husain A, Zollinger M, Stadlinger B, Özcan M, Winklhofer S, Al-Haj Husain N, Schönegg D, Piccirelli M, Valdec S (2024). Magnetic resonance imaging in dental implant surgery: a systematic review. Int J Implant Dent 10, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-024-00532-3
Alzola-Aldamizetxebarria S, Fernández-Méndez L, Padro D, Ruíz-Cabello J, Ramos-Cabrer P (2022). A comprehensive introduction to magnetic resonance imaging relaxometry and contrast agents. ACS Omega 7, 36905-36917. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03549
Assaf AT, Zrnc TA, Remus CC, Schönfeld M, Habermann CR, Riecke B, Friedrich RE, Fiehler J, Heiland M, Sedlacik J (2014). Evaluation of four different optimized magnetic-resonance-imaging sequences for visualization of dental and maxillo-mandibular structures at 3 T. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42, 1356-1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.03.026
Bansal R, Hao X, Liu F, Xu D, Liu J, Peterson BS (2013). The effects of changing water content, relaxation times, and tissue contrast on tissue segmentation and measures of cortical anatomy in MR images. Magn Reson Imaging 31, 1709-1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2013.07.017
Berger A (2002). Magnetic resonance imaging. BMJ 324, 35. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7328.35
Bley TA, Wieben O, François CJ, Brittain JH, Reeder SB (2010). Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 31, 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21895
Bloch F, Hansen WW, Packard M (1946). The nuclear induction experiment. Phys Rev 70, 474-485. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.70.474
Burck I, Liu X, Mahmoudi S, Scholtz JE, Lingwal N, Martin S, Koch V, Fleischmann M, Gotta J, Winkelmann R, Thoenissen P, Stöver T, Vogl TJ, Dos Santos DP (2026). MR imaging with 15-channel dental coil compared with standard 20-channel coil in patients with head and neck tumours and suspected bone invasion. Eur J Radiol 195, 112575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112575
Chong LR, Lee K, Sim FY (2021). 3D MRI with CT-like bone contrast: an overview of current approaches and practical clinical implementation. Eur J Radiol 143, 109915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109915
Cortes AR, Abdala-Junior R, Weber M, Arita ES, Ackerman JL (2015). Influence of pulse sequence parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on MRI artefacts produced by metal-ceramic restorations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44, 20150136. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150136
Del Grande F, Santini F, Herzka DA, Aro MR, Dean CW, Gold GE, Carrino JA (2014). Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiographics 34, 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.341135130
Dentsply Sirona, Siemens Healthineers (2024). The journey to dental-dedicated magnetic resonance imaging [Internet]. Dentsply Sirona [accessed Apr 26, 2026]. Available from: https://www.dentsplysirona.com/content/dam/master/product-procedure-brand-categories/imaging/product-categories/ddmri/IMG-White-paper-ddMRI-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf
Flügge T, Gross C, Ludwig U, Schmitz J, Nahles S, Heiland M, Nelson K (2023). Dental MRI: only a future vision or standard of care? A literature review on current indications and applications of MRI in dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 52, 20220333. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20220333
Flügge T, Hövener JB, Ludwig U, Eisenbeiss AK, Spittau B, Hennig J, Schmelzeisen R, Nelson K (2016). Magnetic resonance imaging of intraoral hard and soft tissues using an intraoral coil and FLASH sequences. Eur Radiol 26, 4616-4623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4254-1
Gaddikeri S, Mossa-Basha M, Andre JB, Hippe DS, Anzai Y (2018). Optimal fat suppression in head and neck MRI: comparison of multipoint Dixon with 2 different fat-suppression techniques, spectral presaturation and inversion recovery, and STIR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39, 362-368. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5483
Gaeta M, Galletta K, Cavallaro M, Mormina E, Cannizzaro MT, Lanzafame LRM, D'Angelo T, Blandino A, Vinci SL, Granata F (2024). T1 relaxation: chemo-physical fundamentals of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical applications. Insights Imaging 15:200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01744-2
Greiser A, Christensen J, Fuglsig JMCS, Johannsen KM, Nixdorf DR, Burzan K, Lauer L, Krueger G, Hayes C, Kettless K, Ulrici J, Spin-Neto R (2024). Dental-dedicated MRI, a novel approach for dentomaxillofacial diagnostic imaging: technical specifications and feasibility. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 53, 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twad004
Grover VPB, Tognarelli JM, Crossey MME, Cox IJ, Taylor-Robinson SD, McPhail MJW (2015). Magnetic resonance imaging: principles and techniques: lessons for clinicians. J Clin Exp Hepatol 5, 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2015.08.001
Han B, Chen N, Luo J, Afkhami F, Peters OA, Wang X (2025). Magnetic resonance imaging for dental pulp assessment: a comprehensive review. J Magn Reson Imaging 62, 362-388. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29742
Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Moeller S, Prasad HS, Garwood M, Nixdorf DR (2011). Dental magnetic resonance imaging: making the invisible visible. J Endod 37, 745-752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.022
Johannsen KM, Christensen J, Matzen LH, Hansen B, Spin-Neto R (2025). Interference of titanium and zirconia implants on dental-dedicated MR image quality: ex vivo and in vivo assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 54, 132-139. https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae071
Kavrakova IG, Haage P, Stueckle CA (2026). Current state-of-the-art 3D MRI sequences for assessing bone morphology with emphasis on cranial and spinal imaging: a narrative review. Rofo 198, 301-324. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2673-4339
Lugauer F, Wetzl J (2018). Magnetic resonance imaging. In: Maier AK, Steidl S, Christlein V, Hornegger J, editors. Medical imaging systems: an introductory guide. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96520-8_6
Morbée L, Vereecke E, Laloo F, Chen M, Herregods N, Jans L (2022). MR imaging of the pelvic bones: the current and cutting-edge techniques. J Belg Soc Radiol 106, 123. https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2874
Niraj LK, Patthi B, Singla A, Gupta R, Ali I, Dhama K, Kumar JK, Prasad M (2016). MRI in dentistry: a future towards radiation free imaging: systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res 10, ZE14-ZE19. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/19435.8658
Nixdorf DR, Greiser A, Hayes C, Gaalaas L, Groenke BR, Fuglsig JMCES, Johannsen KM, Herman CR, Kaimal S, Moana-Filho EJ, Mulet M, Özütemiz C, Spin-Neto R (2025). Comparison of a 0.55 T dental-dedicated magnetic resonance imaging system with a 1.5 T system in evaluation of the temporomandibular joint regarding subjective image quality assessment and rater agreement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 140, 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2025.02.011
Özen AC, Hilgenfeld T, Bock (2026). M. Intraoral coil arrays for single-tooth dental MRI. Magn Reson Med 95, 1858-1865. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70153
Palosaari K, Tervonen O (2002). Post-processing water-fat imaging technique for fat suppression in a low-field MR imaging system: evaluation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. MAGMA 15, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02693838
Parize H, Sadilina S, Caldas RA, Cordeiro JVC, Kleinheinz J, Laganá DC, Sesma N, Bohner L (2024). Magnetic resonance imaging for jawbone assessment: a systematic review. Head Face Med 20, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00424-2
Peper ES, Mackowiak ALC, Bastiaansen JAM (2016). Introduction to the physics behind MR. In: Machine learning in MRI: from methods to clinical translation. Vol. 13. Academic Press; p. 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-14109-6.00003-1
Purcell EM, Torrey HC, Pound RV (1946). Resonance absorption by nuclear magnetic moments in a solid. Phys Rev 69, 37. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.69.37
Rai P, Janu AK, Shetty N, Kulkarni S (2025). Current landscape of short-T2 imaging techniques in the musculoskeletal system: the past, present and future. J Magn Reson Imaging 62, 969-985. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29776
Runge VM, Heverhagen JT (2022). T1, T2, and proton density. In: The physics of clinical MR taught through images. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85413-3_31
Sfondrini MF, Gallo S, Pascadopoli M, Rizzi C, Boldrini A, Santagostini S, Anemoni L, Gorone MSP, Preda L, Gandini P, Scribante A (2023). Effect of magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T on temperature and bond strength of orthodontic bands with welded tubes: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel) 16, 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020651
Tang M, Yamamoto T (2023). Progress in understanding radiofrequency heating and burn injuries for safer MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 22, 7-25. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0047
Vaddi A, Parasher P, Khurana S (2025). Beyond X-rays: unveiling the future of dental diagnosis with dental magnetic resonance imaging. Diagnostics (Basel) 15, 1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091153
Wáng YXJ, Aparisi Gómez MP, Ruiz Santiago F, Bazzocchi A (2023). The relevance of T2 relaxation time in interpreting MRI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map for musculoskeletal structures. Quant Imaging Med Surg 13, 7657-7666. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-1392
Xiao E, Hayat S, He P, Li N, Mo Z, Liao W, Du F, Cui Z, Liang D, Zhang X, Chen Q, Li Y (2026). Fast high-resolution dental MRI using a disposable wireless intraoral coil: from concept to reality. The Innovation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2026.10317