Narrative Review

Dental-dedicated magnetic resonance imaging for

pulpal and periapical diagnosis compared with cone beam computed tomography

Farnaz Namazi 1

Reese K. Williams 2

Vyas Yesha 2

Domenico Ricucci 3

Franklin Tay 4

https://doi.org/10.71347/fde5u7ow


1 Department of Oral Health and Diagnostic Sciences, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Georgia, USA

2 Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, USA

3 Private practice, Cetraro, Italy

4 Department of Endodontics, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA


Corresponding author:

Franklin Tay, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.

Email: ftay@augusta.edu

Key words: apical periodontitis; cone beam computed tomography; dental-dedicated magnetic resonance

imaging; endodontics; periapical diagnosis

Acknowledgements: The authors deny any conflicts of interest. They thank Marie Churchville for secretarial support.

Abstract


Introduction: Periapical diagnosis in endodontics depends largely on radiographic evidence of mineralized tissue changes. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) improves three-dimensional assessment of periapical bone loss, root anatomy, and surgical planning. However, it does not directly depict pulpal status or soft tissue inflammatory changes. This narrative review examined dental-dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (ddMRI) for periapical diagnosis compared with CBCT, with emphasis on the transition from historical dental MRI to a dedicated dental platform.

Methods: The review distinguished pre-2024 dental MRI studies performed on conventional medical MRI systems from ddMRI studies based on the low-field, coil-specific, task-oriented platform introduced by Greiser et al. in 2024. Evidence was synthesized around lesion detection, inflammatory change, lesion characterization, artifacts, radiation exposure, workflow, and clinical positioning.

Results: Dental MRI showed that MRI could detect periapical lesions, depict fluid-rich and marrow-related changes, and characterize cystic versus granulomatous lesions. Dental-dedicated MRI extends this work through localized acquisition, dedicated hardware, and task-specific sequences. Early ddMRI evidence suggests potential for evaluating pulp vitality, regeneration and periapical edema-like change within one non-ionizing examination. However, current data are limited by small feasibility studies and incomplete validation.

references

Al-Haj Husain A, Lie SAN, Sandhu S, Wagner MEH, Stadlinger B, Burian E, Frauenfelder T, Hainc N, Kessler P, Essig H (2025). Magnetic resonance imaging in dental, oral and maxillofacial trauma: a systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 53, 1438-1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.05.016

Al-Haj Husain A, Sandhu S, Wagner MEH, Burian E, Lie SAN, Precht MM, Zedler D, Frauenfelder T, Hötker AM, Stadlinger B, Sommer S, Kessler P, Essig H (2026). Diagnostic performance of CT and MRI in mandibular trauma assessment: a prospective comparative study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 30, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01496-3

Al-Haj Husain A, Zollinger M, Stadlinger B,  Özcan M, Winklhofer S, Al-Haj Husain N, Schönegg D, Piccirelli M, Valdec S (2024). Magnetic resonance imaging in dental implant surgery: a systematic review. Int J Implant Dent 10, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-024-00532-3

Alzola-Aldamizetxebarria S, Fernández-Méndez L, Padro D, Ruíz-Cabello J, Ramos-Cabrer P (2022). A comprehensive introduction to magnetic resonance imaging relaxometry and contrast agents. ACS Omega 7, 36905-36917. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03549

Assaf AT, Zrnc TA, Remus CC, Schönfeld M, Habermann CR, Riecke B, Friedrich RE, Fiehler J, Heiland M, Sedlacik J (2014). Evaluation of four different optimized magnetic-resonance-imaging sequences for visualization of dental and maxillo-mandibular structures at 3 T. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42, 1356-1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.03.026

Bansal R, Hao X, Liu F, Xu D, Liu J, Peterson BS (2013). The effects of changing water content, relaxation times, and tissue contrast on tissue segmentation and measures of cortical anatomy in MR images. Magn Reson Imaging 31, 1709-1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2013.07.017

Berger A (2002). Magnetic resonance imaging. BMJ 324, 35. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7328.35

Bley TA, Wieben O, François CJ, Brittain JH, Reeder SB (2010). Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 31, 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21895

Bloch F, Hansen WW, Packard M (1946). The nuclear induction experiment. Phys Rev 70, 474-485. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.70.474

Burck I, Liu X, Mahmoudi S, Scholtz JE, Lingwal N, Martin S, Koch V, Fleischmann M, Gotta J, Winkelmann R, Thoenissen P, Stöver T, Vogl TJ, Dos Santos DP (2026). MR imaging with 15-channel dental coil compared with standard 20-channel coil in patients with head and neck tumours and suspected bone invasion. Eur J Radiol 195, 112575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112575

Chong LR, Lee K, Sim FY (2021). 3D MRI with CT-like bone contrast: an overview of current approaches and practical clinical implementation. Eur J Radiol 143, 109915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109915

Cortes AR, Abdala-Junior R, Weber M, Arita ES, Ackerman JL (2015). Influence of pulse sequence parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on MRI artefacts produced by metal-ceramic restorations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44, 20150136. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150136

Del Grande F, Santini F, Herzka DA, Aro MR, Dean CW, Gold GE, Carrino JA (2014). Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiographics 34, 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.341135130

Dentsply Sirona, Siemens Healthineers (2024). The journey to dental-dedicated magnetic resonance imaging [Internet]. Dentsply Sirona [accessed Apr 26, 2026]. Available from: https://www.dentsplysirona.com/content/dam/master/product-procedure-brand-categories/imaging/product-categories/ddmri/IMG-White-paper-ddMRI-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf

Flügge T, Gross C, Ludwig U, Schmitz J, Nahles S, Heiland M, Nelson K (2023). Dental MRI: only a future vision or standard of care? A literature review on current indications and applications of MRI in dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 52, 20220333. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20220333

Flügge T, Hövener JB, Ludwig U, Eisenbeiss AK, Spittau B, Hennig J, Schmelzeisen R, Nelson K (2016). Magnetic resonance imaging of intraoral hard and soft tissues using an intraoral coil and FLASH sequences. Eur Radiol 26, 4616-4623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4254-1

Gaddikeri S, Mossa-Basha M, Andre JB, Hippe DS, Anzai Y (2018). Optimal fat suppression in head and neck MRI: comparison of multipoint Dixon with 2 different fat-suppression techniques, spectral presaturation and inversion recovery, and STIR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39, 362-368. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5483

Gaeta M, Galletta K, Cavallaro M, Mormina E, Cannizzaro MT, Lanzafame LRM, D'Angelo T, Blandino A, Vinci SL, Granata F (2024). T1 relaxation: chemo-physical fundamentals of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical applications. Insights Imaging 15:200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01744-2

Greiser A, Christensen J, Fuglsig JMCS, Johannsen KM, Nixdorf DR, Burzan K, Lauer L, Krueger G, Hayes C, Kettless K, Ulrici J, Spin-Neto R (2024). Dental-dedicated MRI, a novel approach for dentomaxillofacial diagnostic imaging: technical specifications and feasibility. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 53, 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twad004

Grover VPB, Tognarelli JM, Crossey MME, Cox IJ, Taylor-Robinson SD, McPhail MJW (2015). Magnetic resonance imaging: principles and techniques: lessons for clinicians. J Clin Exp Hepatol 5, 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2015.08.001

Han B, Chen N, Luo J, Afkhami F, Peters OA, Wang X (2025). Magnetic resonance imaging for dental pulp assessment: a comprehensive review. J Magn Reson Imaging 62, 362-388. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29742

Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Moeller S, Prasad HS, Garwood M, Nixdorf DR (2011). Dental magnetic resonance imaging: making the invisible visible. J Endod 37, 745-752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.022

Johannsen KM, Christensen J, Matzen LH, Hansen B, Spin-Neto R (2025). Interference of titanium and zirconia implants on dental-dedicated MR image quality: ex vivo and in vivo assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 54, 132-139. https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae071

Kavrakova IG, Haage P, Stueckle CA (2026). Current state-of-the-art 3D MRI sequences for assessing bone morphology with emphasis on cranial and spinal imaging: a narrative review. Rofo 198, 301-324. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2673-4339

Lugauer F, Wetzl J (2018). Magnetic resonance imaging. In: Maier AK, Steidl S, Christlein V, Hornegger J, editors. Medical imaging systems: an introductory guide. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96520-8_6

Morbée L, Vereecke E, Laloo F, Chen M, Herregods N, Jans L (2022). MR imaging of the pelvic bones: the current and cutting-edge techniques. J Belg Soc Radiol 106, 123. https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2874

Niraj LK, Patthi B, Singla A, Gupta R, Ali I, Dhama K, Kumar JK, Prasad M (2016). MRI in dentistry: a future towards radiation free imaging: systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res 10, ZE14-ZE19. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/19435.8658

Nixdorf DR, Greiser A, Hayes C, Gaalaas L, Groenke BR, Fuglsig JMCES, Johannsen KM, Herman CR, Kaimal S, Moana-Filho EJ, Mulet M, Özütemiz C, Spin-Neto R (2025). Comparison of a 0.55 T dental-dedicated magnetic resonance imaging system with a 1.5 T system in evaluation of the temporomandibular joint regarding subjective image quality assessment and rater agreement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 140, 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2025.02.011

Özen AC, Hilgenfeld T, Bock (2026). M. Intraoral coil arrays for single-tooth dental MRI. Magn Reson Med 95, 1858-1865. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70153

Palosaari K, Tervonen O (2002). Post-processing water-fat imaging technique for fat suppression in a low-field MR imaging system: evaluation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. MAGMA 15, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02693838

Parize H, Sadilina S, Caldas RA, Cordeiro JVC, Kleinheinz J, Laganá DC, Sesma N, Bohner L (2024). Magnetic resonance imaging for jawbone assessment: a systematic review. Head Face Med 20, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00424-2

Peper ES, Mackowiak ALC, Bastiaansen JAM (2016). Introduction to the physics behind MR. In: Machine learning in MRI: from methods to clinical translation. Vol. 13. Academic Press; p. 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-14109-6.00003-1

Purcell EM, Torrey HC, Pound RV (1946). Resonance absorption by nuclear magnetic moments in a solid. Phys Rev 69, 37. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.69.37

Rai P, Janu AK, Shetty N, Kulkarni S (2025). Current landscape of short-T2 imaging techniques in the musculoskeletal system: the past, present and future. J Magn Reson Imaging 62, 969-985. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29776

Runge VM, Heverhagen JT (2022). T1, T2, and proton density. In: The physics of clinical MR taught through images. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85413-3_31

Sfondrini MF, Gallo S, Pascadopoli M, Rizzi C, Boldrini A, Santagostini S, Anemoni L, Gorone MSP, Preda L, Gandini P, Scribante A (2023). Effect of magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T on temperature and bond strength of orthodontic bands with welded tubes: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel) 16, 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020651

Tang M, Yamamoto T (2023). Progress in understanding radiofrequency heating and burn injuries for safer MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 22, 7-25. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0047

Vaddi A, Parasher P, Khurana S (2025). Beyond X-rays: unveiling the future of dental diagnosis with dental magnetic resonance imaging. Diagnostics (Basel) 15, 1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091153

Wáng YXJ, Aparisi Gómez MP, Ruiz Santiago F, Bazzocchi A (2023). The relevance of T2 relaxation time in interpreting MRI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map for musculoskeletal structures. Quant Imaging Med Surg 13, 7657-7666. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-1392

Xiao E, Hayat S, He P,  Li N, Mo Z, Liao W, Du F, Cui Z, Liang D, Zhang X, Chen Q, Li Y (2026). Fast high-resolution dental MRI using a disposable wireless intraoral coil: from concept to reality. The Innovation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2026.10317