Laboratory Research
Impact of traditional, conservative and ultraconservative access cavities on root canal shaping
Luis F. Jiménez-Rojas, MSc 1
Kaline Romeiro, PhD 1
Sabrina C. Brasil, PhD 1
Renata Perez, PhD 2
José C. Provenzano, PhD 1
Fábio R. Pires, PhD 3
Flávio R. F. Alves, PhD 1
Isabela N. Rôças, PhD 1
José F. Siqueira Jr, PhD 1
https://doi.org/10.71347/kba25jr7
1 Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, University of Grande Rio (UNIGRANRIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
2 North of Minas United Faculty, Department of Endodontics, Ipatinga, MG, Brazil.
3 Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Estácio de Sá University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Corresponding author:
Flávio R. F. Alves, PhD, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, University of Grande Rio (UNIGRANRIO) Rua Professor José de Souza Herdy, 1160, Duque de Caxias, RJ, Brazil 25071-202
e-mail: flavioferreiraalves@gmail.com
Key words: Access cavity; micro-computed tomography; minimally invasive endodontics; root canal preparation.
Acknowledgements: Supported by grants from the Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brazilian Governmental Institutions.
The authors deny any conflicts of interest.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the impact of traditional, conservative/contracted, and ultraconservative/”ninja” access cavities on root canal shaping using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).
Methods: Mesial canals from freshly extracted mandibular molars with pulp vitality were scanned in micro- CT for sample selection. Specimens matched by anatomic similarities were distributed into 3 experimental groups according to the endodontic access cavity types (traditional, conservative, and ultraconservative). After canal preparation using R-Motion instruments size 25.06, the specimens were once again scanned to assess diverse shaping parameters.
Results: There were significant differences in the increment rate of root canal volume and area between traditional and ultraconservative access cavities (P < .05). The amount of unprepared canal areas was significantly higher with the ultraconservative access cavity in comparison with the other groups (P < .05). Intergroup analysis did not reveal significant differences in the structure model index, amount of accumulated hard tissue debris, dentin removed, and remaining thickness of pericervical dentin (P > .05).
Augusto CM, Barbosa AFA, Guimaraes CC et al. (2020) A laboratory study of the impact of ultraconservative access cavities and minimal root canal tapers on the ability to shape canals in extracted mandibular molars and their fracture resistance. International Endodontic Journal 53, 1516-29.
Barbosa AFA, Silva E, Coelho BP, Ferreira CMA, Lima CO, Sassone LM (2020) The influence of endodontic access cavity design on the efficacy of canal instrumentation, microbial reduction, root canal filling and fracture resistance in mandibular molars. International Endodontic Journal 53, 1666-79.
Basturk FB, Ozyurek T, Uslu G, Gundogar M (2022) Mechanical Properties of the New Generation RACE EVO and R-Motion Nickel-Titanium Instruments. Materials (Basel) 15.
Carvalho KKT, Petean IBF, Silva-Sousa AC et al. (2022) Impact of several NiTi-thermally treated instrumentation systems on biomechanical preparation of curved root canals in extracted mandibular molars. International Endodontic Journal 55, 124-36.
Clark D, Khademi J (2010) Modern molar endodontic access and directed dentin conservation. Dental Clinics of North America 54, 249-73.
Freitas GR, Ribeiro TM, Vilella FSG, de Melo TAF (2021) Influence of endodontic cavity access on curved root canal preparation with ProDesign Logic rotary instruments. Clinical Oral Investigations 25, 469-75.
Gergi R, Osta N, Bourbouze G, Zgheib C, Arbab-Chirani R, Naaman A (2015) Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. International Endodontic Journal 48, 162-70.
Guedes IG, Rodrigues RCV, Marceliano-Alves MF, Alves FRF, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr. (2022) Shaping ability of new reciprocating or rotary instruments with two cross-sectional designs: An ex vivo study. International Endodontic Journal 55, 1385-93.
Gutmann JL (2013) Minimally invasive dentistr y (Endodontics). J Conserv Dent 16, 282-3.
Kishen A (2015) Biomechanics of fractures in endodontically treated teeth. Endodontic Topics 33, 10.
Krishan R, Paque F, Ossareh A, Kishen A, Dao T, Friedman S (2014) Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed in incisors, premolars, and molars. Journal of Endodontics 40, 1160-6.
Lima CO, Barbosa AFA, Ferreira CM et al. (2020) The impact of minimally invasive root canal preparation strategies on the ability to shape root canals of mandibular molars. International Endodontic Journal 53, 1680-8.
Miranda ARLS, de Moura JDM, Calefi PHS et al. (2022) Influence of conservative endodontic access cavities on instrumentation of oval-shaped straight root canals. International Endodontic Journal 55, 103-12.
Moore B, Verdelis K, Kishen A, Dao T, Friedman S (2016) Impacts of contracted endodontic cavities on instrumentation efficacy and biomechanical responses in maxillary molars. Journal of Endodontics 42, 1779-83.
Moraes RDR, Perez R, Silva A et al. (2021) Micro- CT evaluation of root canal preparation with rotary instrumentation on prototyped primary incisors. Brazilian Oral Research 35, e132.
Moriya PT, de Carvalho KKT, Kishen A, Souza EM, Versiani MA (2023) Quasi-3D dynamic photoelastic analysis of stress distribution during preparation of simulated canals with 13 mechanical preparation systems. International Endodontic Journal 56, 1399-411.
Mustafa M (2021) Comparative Evaluation of Canal- shaping Abilities of RaceEvo, R-Motion, Reciproc Blue, and ProTaper Gold NiTi Rotary File Systems: A CBCT Study. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 22, 1406-12.
Ricucci D, Candeiro GT, Bugea C, Siqueira JF, Jr. (2016) Complex apical intraradicular infection and extraradicular mineralized biofilms as the cause of wet canals and treatment failure: report of 2 cases. Journal of Endodontics 42, 509-15.
Rover G, Belladonna FG, Bortoluzzi EA, De-Deus G, Silva E, Teixeira CS (2017) Influence of access cavity design on root canal detection, instrumentation efficacy, and fracture resistance assessed in maxillary molars. Journal of Endodontics 43, 1657-62.
Santosh SS, Ballal S, Natanasabapathy V (2021) Influence of Minimally Invasive Access Cavity Designs on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Molars Subjected to Thermocycling and Dynamic Loading. Journal of Endodontics 47, 1496-500.
Silva AA, Belladonna FG, Rover G et al. (2020) Does ultraconservative access affect the efficacy of root canal treatment and the fracture resistance of two-rooted maxillary premolars? International Endodontic Journal 53, 265-75.
Siqueira JF, Jr., Alves FR, Versiani MA et al. (2013) Correlative bacteriologic and micro-computed tomographic analysis of mandibular molar mesial canals prepared by self- adjusting file, Reciproc, and Twisted File systems. Journal of Endodontics 39, 1044-50.
Siqueira JF, Jr., Perez AR, Marceliano-Alves MF et al. (2018a) What happens to unprepared root canal walls: a correlative analysis using micro-computed tomography and histology/scanning electron microscopy. International Endodontic Journal 51, 501-8.
Siqueira JF, Jr., Perez AR, Marceliano-Alves MF et al. (2018b) What happens to unprepared root canal walls: a correlative analysis using micro-computed tomography and histology/scanning electron microscopy. International Endodontic Journal 51, 501-8.
Siqueira JFJ, Rôças IN (2008) Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. Journal of Endodontics 34, 1291-301 e3.
Vertucci FJ (1984) Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology 58, 589-99.
Vieira GCS, Perez AR, Alves FRF et al. (2020) Impact of contracted endodontic cavities on root canal disinfection and shaping. Journal of Endodontics 46, 655-61.
Xia J, Wang W, Li Z et al. (2020) Impacts of contracted endodontic cavities compared to traditional endodontic cavities in premolars. BMC Oral Health 20, 250.